/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2544351

>>2532557
We do live in a godless universe

Do you still believe in Santa Clause too?

\thread

>>2319781
>but is there really that much of a need to have a roadmap which describes current technology and possible future directions peer-reviewed?

Wow, you are fuckin retarded! Of course you dumbshit! Else it is no better then one crazy persons opinion.......DURRRRRRR

I could write a paper on all sorts of bullshit. Legitimizing how Harry Potter is going to happen IRL in the next 10 years. I would cite all sorts of articles, and present that shit as fact. And dumbasses who really like Harry Potter would buy into that shit. They would swear that shit was true, and was going to happen. Then they would cite my paper, as some sort or legit source......LMAO. (Just as you do with transhumanism). YOU ARE GETTING TROLLED BY YOUR OWN SOURCE!

Again, your source make some fucking grand claims, yet is not peer-reviewed. Your source seems not scientific, it appears on a university page for there philosophy department. WTF?
Please provide a scientifc source, when talking about science.

>>2278861

>>2235778
Samefags with same timepost?
Sure brah, whatever helps you feel better an night

ITT: underage fagggots have a shit fit cause they cant handle the idea of no soul

>>2129830
>wat do

Step 1) Act like a freshman, and bitch about everything

Step 2) Do assignment: learn to appreciate cal

Step 3) Study, go to class, do work

Step 4) THANK PROFESSOR. Realize the importance of the assignment. Realize the professor is a pretty good teacher. Realzie I actually know CAL! PROFIT!

>>2092623
>if something doesn't have a rest frame, what does that say about the nature of it?

It is not part of the poincare group, that is the only actual conclsuion we can arrive at. Everything is is just speculative nonsense.

\thread

>>2054079
>but it seems like we don't really know by what function or process this "absorbtion" occurs

WTF AM I READING? of course we know this shit! Let me introduce you to QED

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_electrodynamics

\thread

>>1963254
A) ugh, really? Okay, the Dark Ages ended with the fall of the Roman Empire and ended with the proliferation of the Renaissance. I suppose the fact that a thousand basic scientific ideas, such as a heliocentric solar system, were being fought by the church in that time frame means nothing to you?

B) And no, Christianity did not invent the Feudal system. However, divine right was used as justification for the way it was being used in Europe. Who was on top and who was on bottom was not to be questioned, because God deems it so. And the people on the top were the ones doing (A).

As you were engaging me in a historical debate with some fervor, I thought maybe you were an educated individual with a different perspective than myself. But really, you couldn't think of one scientific view fought by the religious establishment during the dark ages? Idiot. I feel foolish for even replying to you.

>>1911750
No, I could compare the best nuclear engineers to just about any particle/nuclear or theortical physicist, and the physicist would outperform the engineer 100% of the time.

Engineering is grunt work compared to physics, thats why engineers work for physicits....durrrrr.

Someone needs to do the manual labor and get the coffee. And dont ever try to talk me about CERN you fucking retard, I work there, and everyone knows the peaking order. Engineers being just above the janitors and below the bussiness administrators. Physicist being on top.

>>1900136

You know what's awesome? This guy just compared his face, something that exists in real life, to an anime image. And he compared anime to real life as part of an expression against comparing anime to real life. That's awesome.

>>1874298

So the wording is confusing you...let me clarify.
Yes, the "time process began" is usually the correct term. "Began" is not used it the "linear" sense, but as a "delimiter" to signify the difference between two states, those with time and those without time.

At t >0 (the universe)
at t=0 (the big bang)
There is no t<0 (no time states exist)

Do you get it now?
Have you read any physics at all?

>>1795182
Military = Cream of the CROP.....LMAO
LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO

Do you have anymore funny jokes?

>>1775932

Wtf are you talking about?
>>1775895
>>1775898
>>1775900
>>1775905
>>1775917
>>1775918
>>1775893
ARE ALL ENGINEERING POSTS!
STOP FAGGING UP SCI!

>>1771430
why do you have such a shitty job then?
Sounds like you arent that smart either.

>>1761295

You are not screwed, you need to hang out with more physicists. Although you will probably be a dumbass in comparision. They may not want to date such a stupid girl.

>Space is very big, too big to get to any place exciting for millions or billions of years, even at light speed.

So you never heard of physics?
Even going sublight speeds it only takes about 28 years to reach the edge of the galaxy (relative to the traveler).

http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SR/rocket.html

It is very possible for humanity to seed other planets.
\thread

Why are you such a dumbass OP?

>>1603892
So /sci/, two questions:

>1. should i attend NCSSM or go with the IB diploma program?

Just get a regular high school dimploma dipshit.
Boarding school? WTF is wrong with you?

>2. how can i get a spot in a good foreign (europe only, please) university ON THE CHEAP??

Don't go to a foreign school for college! Again WTF is wrong with you? Just go to a regular good US School. It will help you better acedemically and financially!

>>1006717
engineers are scientists

NO, JUST NO, YOU INSULT ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS! YOU FAIL!