/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16151039
>interaction between particles or fields
Please explain which interactions do cause collapse and which don't. All known forces are shown via delayed choice experiments to be insufficient for this purpose. So please explain what additional factor is needed.

>>15523684
This question was far away from being homework. It is known as "Hilbert's 10th problem" and its solution is known as Matiyasevich's theorem. This should be basic knowledge for someone who claims to be into "super axiomatic and fundamental stuff". You're a larper, and worst of all you're too immature to admit when you don't know something.

>xe's still caught in the "materialism vs idealism" trap
Sigh. Midwits, when will they ever learn?

>>15212055
I'm not asking why, I'm asking how. This is Science and not philosophy. And in Science we expect convincing answers, not your goalpost moving deflection.

>>6977269
>As far as we know, literally everything has had some cause.

Nope.
lrn2quantummechanics

>>6254489
>I never said that. I said the complete opposite actually.

You said he solved the hard problem. This is demonstrably wrong. Is short-term memory another cognitive function affected by your developmental deficit?

>>6216683
How hard did you fail your probability class? Do you honestly believe every probability distribution is uniform? I admire your wealth of ignorance!

>>6178475
Why don't you link me to your peer reviewed publication? Show me the experimental design you applied to solve the hard problem of consciousness. Come on, show me science instead of teenaged sophistry!

>this thread

>>5915342
I'm not him, just an onlooker, watching the hilarity that is you.
Better lurk moar before you post

>>4805953
No pictures, 8 friends.

Fake Facebook page is fake.

>>4762842
>implying you can't derive all of 3D euclidean geometry from basic vector calculus

>implying you can't derive basic 2D projection form basic vector calculus

Are you fucking retarded?
Just because you aren't smart enough to do something pretty trivial, doesn't make it impossible to do, tt just makes you a fucking moron!

>>4409353
But that isn't the standard model, that isn't quantum field theory. That is fucking classical mechanics you retarded piece of shit.

Yes, classical mecahnics uses the idea of contact forces. Yes, statsitical mechanics says that there contact forces can be derived from QFT, and the standard model. That is fucking trivial, NO ONE IS ARGUING THAT SHIT WITH YOU.

The standard model isn't "all fucking physics" though. The standard model is a very particular Quantum field theory, you dumbfuck. The standard model doesn't ever ever ever mention the shitty notion of newtonian force.

You really need to get your fucking head out of you ass and learn the differences between the different branched of physics.

If you are ever smart enough to take a standard model, quantum mech, or QFF class (or even read a fucking book), YOU WILL NEVER EVEN ENCOUNTER THE CONCEPT OF NEWTONIAN FORCE.

Newtonian force is only used in classical mechanics, it is never used in any other branch of physics. Why? Because it is an outdated concept that produces nonsense when you try to apply it to most physical systems. The shitty newtonian force approach to physics gives you irreconcilable singularities everyfucking where.

>>4374431
Are you 10 years old? Mentally retarded? Trolling?

>>4306613
>implying the double pendulum is not a chaotic system

>>4199075
>12 year old detected

Just because you aren't educated enough or smart enough to understand very very very basic shit, doesn't make it gibberish. It just makes you stupid and uneducated.

>>3654964
Why the fuck would your risk your carrer to give a few hicks some articles they can't even understand?

>>3611726
>Can't fucking grasp what I mean by Intellegence/Education, yet claims to be in university

It basically boils down to this: 1) critical thinking ability, 2) knowledge of relavent facts (informed).

An informed critical thinker usually makes better choices/decisons then an uninformed retard.

IT IS THAT FUCKING SIMPLE DUDE. I THINK YOU NEED TO SPEND MORE FUCKING TIME AT UNIVERSITY KID.

>>3611734
Nope. No Social Science for me bro.

>>3134815
>States the obvious
>Makes no point

Who get to be one one to say when society is "good" and no longer needs to change then? At what point do we say, we are done? Did we already go too far? Should we re-enslave the blacks? Should we subjugate the women again? Are do we still have a way to go? Do we wait until gays can marry?

Who decides when society is "perfect" and doesn't need to be changed?

You are part of a loosing argument son. You only way you feel like you do, because you're either uneducated, or hang out with way too many old people.

>>3008602
>6*.5*(1+2)=9

This assumes that "2" is the only term under the "/" sign, so that you can make it "1/2" = ".5"
There is also a reading where the terms under the "/" sign is "2(1+2)" which = "1/6".
6*(1/6) = 1.

I can't believe people are still arguing about this.

>>2853214
>but there might just be something out there that is buildable on public knowledge, I'm not saying there is, but there's a good chance.

>>2752008

The maximum load is exactly in the middle.

You will see maximum deflection at that point.

I know with a constant UDL the slope will be a nice straight line.

In this case I can see the load goes from 0 - maximum over 6 meters, with each step having an exponential increase but how would I mathematically say that?

>>2750110
>>2750110
>soccermom-liberal propaganda-spouting

WTF? are you high?
STOP WATCHING FAUX! IT IS MAKING YOU RETARDED!

>>2564507
>Phil major jumping to bad conclusions
>as always

Who ever mentioned money? How fucking reatrded are you?