/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8995832
>Nice try, but evolution doesn't have things turning
And the shellgame continues.

>Actually, NOW it's corn. Before, it was grass.
Anything to back that up, seems like maize was created the way it was, not bred from grass. If this were the case, we'd have (non-hypothetical) transitional forms.

>And if you knew what the Law of Large Numbers is, you'd understand why one relates to the other.
I understand that you're conflating the two.

>"reproduce better" means only "leave more offspring". which is a nice objective scale.
What about overpopulation? Such a standard would leave ecosystems devastated. It's almost as if they were designed in such a way to prevent that.

>didn't know you were the kind of troglodyte who's amazed by the word "millions". it's like showing a shiny rock to a monkey.
I myself am not, but I know many other people on here are.

>but it WASN'T maize before. it was fucking grass.
Again, burden of proof is on you, here.