/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11685577
the data says otherwise
>>11685574
the majority of other interpretations are deterministic, even many worlds claims to be.
Shut up and calculate is not the copenhagen interpretation, it's saying that we don't know so just keep going

Is this the most embarrassing graph in physics? Why is it taking so long to come up with a good answer to a stupid double slit experiment?

What does sci believe in? Is it just the pilot wave after all?

>>10534242
Not sure about your "poll" but here's one. Pilot-wave is near dead.

>https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.1069

>>10511077
>None of them work
>Gives the same results
Retard. They work just like Cuckenhagen does. Because, these are not theories but interpretations you brainlet.
>every physicist rejects them
I don't. And a lot don't as well.
>Pic related
http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2013/01/17/the-most-embarrassing-graph-in-modern-physics/

If you ask 10 scientist, you could get 10 different answers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZacggH9wB7Y