/sci/ - Science & Math

If monkeys evolved into humans, they why aren't monkeys still evolving into humans today?
Have we ever seen in the last 100 years (since humans began documenting about the animals) any radical evolution, or yet, any monkeys/chimpanzee that began a radical process of evolution ?
No. It is still a " theory " that has yet to be proven by any scientist.

OP, evolving systems are not like purpose built ones. They are not efficient at all.

What you have in junk DNA is a fuckton of chances for a new mutation, in the next generation, without upsetting the existing, active genes.

And it's also the storage place for deactivated genes.

A lot of possibilities, but none of it being expressed. A sort of DNA reserve, if you will.

Anyway, fuck you for letting religion into your science.

LAWS OF SCIENCE
>LIFE CANNOT COME FROM NON LIFE
>THERE IS NOT ONE CASE OF A MAMMAL OBTAINING NEW GENETICS OUT OF THIN AIR.

Macroevolution says otherwise. Macroevolution is not science because it contradicts science. Science experiments trying to prove macroevolution and the big bang by constructing things together completely contradicts evolution.

Majority of evolutionists believe evolution is random. If it wasn't there is an intelligent designer behind it. God. By creating instances by manipulating cells and DNA, they are playing god/intelligent designer.

If evolution is true and we are nothing but cells,
>we have no free will
>everything we do is predetermined
>we are acting the way we are supposed.

I don't even need to begin to get into this. There is absolutely zero empirical evidence of evolution. Macroevolution requires more faith than God.

i don't blame you kids for believing in evolution; you've only been spoon-fed it your entire government school run lives, and taught to immediately dismiss any evidence to the contrary.

look at all the evidence. the evidence presented in this thread took 5 minutes to refute. no, it's not a walking whale, it's a dinosaur. no, that fish didn't walk on its fins, it used them to hunt prey in the water. no, man and ape do not share a common ancestor, as there is no common ancestor, only the thought that there should be, if evolution is right.

it is not right. you have to have faith in it. it begs for your faith. you have to believe that the universe spontaneously generated itself somehow, or by gravity, and you have to believe you are the product of random chance.

so your life is meaningless, in that it only has the meaning you ascribe to it.

no loving God. no angels. no devil. no heaven. no hell. just a short, brief, painful life and then a dirt nap.

the universe does not operate like that, and no amount of belief in evolution will ever change God.

LAWS OF SCIENCE
>LIFE CANNOT COME FROM NON LIFE
>THERE IS NOT ONE CASE OF A MAMMAL OBTAINING NEW GENETICS OUT OF THIN AIR.

Macroevolution says otherwise. Macroevolution is not science because it contradicts science. Science experiments trying to prove macroevolution and the big bang by constructing things together completely contradicts evolution.

Majority of evolutionists believe evolution is random. If it wasn't there is an intelligent designer behind it. God. By creating instances by manipulating cells and DNA, they are playing god/intelligent designer.

If evolution is true and we are nothing but cells,
>we have no free will
>everything we do is predetermined
>we are acting the way we are supposed.

I don't even need to begin to get into this. Macroevolution requires more faith than God.

Bump

So my thread was deleted because a bunch of atheist evolutionists tried censoring me when they realized they couldn't answer my questions and I and another poster cornered them.
>>>>http://green-oval.net/cgi-board.pl/sci/thread/3421490#p3422247
1. If we evolved from apes, then why are there still apes?
2. Why are there no transitional fossils? Artists renditions and fake skeletons made out of concrete don't count.
3. why do people still have faith in macro evolution, knowing that there is no direct evidence for it, and that all the so-called "evidence" for macro (not micro) evolution is bogus?

Checkmate atheists

So my thread was deleted because a bunch of atheist evolutionists tried censoring me when they realized they couldn't answer my questions and I and another poster cornered them.
>>http://green-oval.net/cgi-board.pl/sci/thread/3421490#p3422247
1. If we evolved from apes, then why are there still apes?
2. Why are there no transitional fossils? Artists renditions and fake skeletons made out of concrete don't count.
3. why do people still have faith in macro evolution, knowing that there is no direct evidence for it, and that all the so-called "evidence" for macro (not micro) evolution is bogus?

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

i don't blame you kids for believing in evolution; you've only been spoon-fed it your entire government school run lives, and taught to immediately dismiss any evidence to the contrary.

look at all the evidence. the evidence presented in this thread took 5 minutes to refute. no, it's not a walking whale, it's a dinosaur. no, that fish didn't walk on its fins, it used them to hunt prey in the water. no, man and ape do not share a common ancestor, as there is no common ancestor, only the thought that there should be, if evolution is right.

it is not right. you have to have faith in it. it begs for your faith. you have to believe that the universe spontaneously generated itself somehow, or by gravity, and you have to believe you are the product of random chance.

so your life is meaningless, in that it only has the meaning you ascribe to it.

no loving God. no angels. no devil. no heaven. no hell. just a short, brief, painful life and then a dirt nap.

the universe does not operate like that, and no amount of belief in evolution will ever change God.

Checkmate atheists

This is a real church sign.

Right on OP.

Fuck 'naturalism', it is of the devil.

>>intelligent design

This is a real sign.

mfw there are human beings who haven't confronted mortality yet and have to rely on fantasies.

Fucksake, we've had 2 million years as a species to grow up.

post images; tales of religious stupidity.

pic related.

>1911
>still no fossil records of missing link
>believing in dinosaurs