/sci/ - Science & Math

not him but
>>14606684
Chinese communist party (you trust) uploads
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947

Big pharma scientists magically conjure a mass producable testkit for novel viroid

Big pharma scientists simply copy paste into their tech stack, outputs their solution

No purified isolates,
What is the sensitivity and specificity of the instruments used to inform your perspectives, the PCR cycle counts, etc.

The first stage in not coping is to become clear not on whats just true or false, but what are known-unknowns and unknown-unknowns.

If you havent had a direct hand in the measurement of your data, how do you characterize its fundemental assumptions, save just taking it on trust alone

>>14601592
suspicions arouse after academic literature reported high false positive and false negative rates on the testkits through bayes.

operating as tentative assumption began when superimposing flu data and covid data revealed no excess, just like one would expect if test kits were catching flu

bets placed on assumption after pic related

>>14587223
I'd be rather irritated if Mcdonalds lied about how much they were paying their workers however. These stats concern average pay.

I do find this point quite relevent though, the jones effect, no little form of cryptographic verifyability of the like button, view count, GPT bot reply or other such metrics, can have quite a drastic effect on nudging the behaviour of someone, I wouldn't want many of these things inside the same neural net without knowing the purpose behind the algorithm

Your actions bring me great joy, philosopher of Bayes, teacher of crucial and pertinent knowledges, I would hope to offer you not a single class room not in one school, but one the world