/sci/ - Science & Math

Is transhumanism theism for STEM graduates?

>Mankind as God
>Unprovable promises of eternal life and heaven-like experiences
>Personal transcendence or singularity transcendence
>Magical thinking (mind uploading will somehow not kill the original consciousness)
>Cult-like figures (Eliezer Yudkowsky)

Hello all, Im making something big that requires extreme amounts of electricity in the shortest amount of time with the least amount of resistance. Cant seem to find any decent cables/wires that have high ampacity or voltage ratings. Can anyone point me towards any good online stores??

How accurate is this ?

15years
>nuclear fusion
>unlimited source of power
>free power for the entire world
>unprecedented economic boom easily 100-1000 greater than any previous
20 years
>molecular assemblers
>freedom from the "economy" as we know it, everything is freely available, no more rich / poor, every part of the world is as prosperous as anywhere else
28 years
>teleportation
50-70 years
>transhumanism

>>4669696

Thanks bro. Transhuman fistbump.

>>4669697

Again, you need to be 100% sure that the target actually has the symptom you're looking for. And even then, all the MRI says is that this area of the brain lights up. It could be caused by the focus or the meditation. It doesn't prove the tulpa any more than a pen on the ground can be used to determine what someone wrote without a known copy of the letter.

But /sci/ you said we were still hundreds if not thousands of years from this technology.

Faster than light.
Where is your god now, scientists.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484

>>3706394
Why would the world collapses?

Well, in fact I also believe we're going to see huge chaos as technology brings profound change. We're already seeing a little of it's beginning, with the Arab revolutions that spread to other regions in the world (with information technology, everything becomes more simultaneous).

But I don't think the age has really anything to do with that.

Sampling a continuous y(t) = A sin(wt)
=> yk = y[k] = A sin(wkT) = A sin (Ok)

T is the sample interval in seconds
w = small omega
O = big omega

What sampling frequency fs=1/T will we have to use if we later want to recreate y(t), when 8 sin (955t) + 6 sin (1621t)

It's because science hipsters can only like science as long as it's not popular.

Fucking idiots whine about science being hated and then shit on people that try to make it more popular.

SCIENCE HIPSTERS DELENDA EST

>implying the singularity isn't sneaking up on us faster than we think
>implying we haven't reached the rapid growth phase

So this calls for a singularity thread! Let the shitstorm begin.

Tell me /sci/borgs..are your bodies ready?