/sci/ - Science & Math

How long would the Earth need to stop rotating and stand still for the inertia of the wind's velocity to drop to zero and there be no more wind?

In addition, how many rotations at what speed would the Earth need to rotate in order for the wind to return to normal speeds?

>>10099654
>>10099658
I'm always interested in what people like him have to say, but whenever alternate evidence is provided they sperg out
Plus the whole arguing semantics of a word always seems to happen

>stream goes down immediately after /sci/ goal
Gee I wonder who's behind this

>>9484871
>autistic savants
What did he mean by this?

Are there any genuinely health risks to a life of complete celibacy?

>>9176084
>Hey I'm an engineer and I can help
>WOW STOP GLOATING FUCKING AUTIST

What the actual fuck

>>9156059
>labels selective breeding of dogs "natural selection"
Creationists are mentally defective.

>>9143783
What makes them degenerates?

What are protons made of?

>>9117882
>wah empiricism is wrong and cant exist!

>>9112059
>Gravity

>things accelerating towards other things
>the things have mass
>not a force

perhaps you mean gravitation is not a force, but gravity is?

>>9095290
>brain drain

oh, and you're shit country uses metric, as it has been on the metric standard of measurements since it was introduced by the french, all that happens is semantic conversions

>>9077246
Tom Scott did the the exact same thing he accused Sam of; prescribing motive to Trump's actions in that he's playing 4D chess. Kind of curious as to why Sam let such a contradiction slip.

[math]\frac{(6^2)}{(2(3)+4)}[/math]

[math]\frac{6^2}{2(3)}+4[/math]

[math]\frac{6^2}{2} *(3+4)[/math]

>>9066898
>~25% of Americastan takes the bible literally
>~50% believe it to be non-literal

You don't understand how vast the power and reach of Christianity is in America dude, everything else is so god damn minute. At least most jews are secular.

It's funny though, the Republicans in America are quite cohesive and tow the party line, where as the Democrats are more fractured in their beliefs and vote to their constituents/donors beliefs more oft than not. I don't know why people refer to "the left" and "the right" both as monolithic figures though, it's inaccurate and does nothing but make you feel better in your own beliefs.

>>9036534
>>9036553
>OP is a postdoc
>"have you tried getting your PhD somewhere else?"

reading comprehension of a brick lmao

>>9032174
>What the fuck do you think you're talking about?

>long division

>>9008755
really exercises your cerebral cortex

>>8927437
>I'm a real mathematician doing serious research
>but also men shouldn't ever ask me questions about my work
I'm sorry, colleagues asking you about your work is part and parcel of it. if you're not willing to discuss it with people, you should find another line of work that doesn't rely so heavily on peer review et cetera

>>8874185
>Full paper here:
As stated >>8873939
>That is not a full paper. That is literally an abstract followed by a conclusion. Since neither contains anything about their methodology or data, it's pretty much worthless to people who don't blindly believe what other people say.
Why do you insist on posting blatant lies after they've been refuted earlier in the same thread? Do you just reject anything that doesn't support your opinions, or are you actually mentally handicapped?

It quite fits the denier mindset, though, to have a paper with only abstract and conclusion. No background explaining the question at hand, no pesky methodology or results, just a bunch of assertions. Sadly, the denier way of doing things isn't exactly scientific.

Thanks for the responses guys, I know how it works-- I guess it's just difficult for me to grasp how that produced the outcome it has

2

>>8811697
What if I did?