/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14724106
>peer review doesn't mean shit
Then your opinion is even more meaningless. I'll still read your analysis of their papers, for laughs.

>the predictions will always be wrong
Wishful thinking is not an argument.

>please continue listening to people that play connect the dots with ice cores, tree rings, mercury and thermistors
OK, I will. Please stop listening to oil shills and political bloggers who ignore data and have none of their own.

>>12727021
>Get back to me when climate models can accurately predict the behavior of water as a greenhouse gas
They already do.

>>12719985
>I-i-it's inaccurate! Trust me guys haha, no need to check.
You're pathetic.