/sci/ - Science & Math

>>Dennett is an authority in the field.
>>Implying anyone understands shit about the nature of consciousness more than anyone else
>>mfw

>>MWF nobody in this thread has seen Cherry 2000

Nothing new here -- men would only replace women if you buy into some bullshit notion of The Patriarchy which is generally only believed in by insane feminists. Everyday joes wouldn't dream realistically of such a thing. Now, do I imagine that fembots and dudebots and artificial wombs will eventually exist? Indeed, we have inanimate sexbots already, we just need more sophisticated (and more importantly, cheaper) artificial intellect and robotics and eventually our fleshlight will do dishes for us. But men would never replace women completely because (A) they depend on them emotionally and (B) without real women, men turn gay. Don't ask me, ask the Middle East -- gender segregation leads to men falling all over each-other to bone 12-year-old boys. Only the most emotionally damaged among us can stand being unable to communicate with the thing they're dicking (and if this were untrue, nobody would have a girlfriend and everyone would have a fleshlight.)

Of course you COULD give the little boys some very convincingly feminine features, but then you come full circle because I guaran-fucking-tee that a creature of any gender, given the hormones and social conditioning women receive, will turn out psychologically indistinguishable from a woman. And I'm also not even touching the very real possibility that women would merely start swapping out their pussies for dicks and so on, once technology becomes sufficient.

>>2509670
Agreed, the invisible hand of market will fix everything. Industries will start using less polluting but much more expensive technologies, that they will have developped without any immediate promise of gain