/sci/ - Science & Math

Did he really say that?

Bill Nye could've just ended the debate 30 seconds in by saying that there's starlight coming from objects 14 billion light years away.

I want to seriously know how indoctrinated you need to be in order to believe this mumbo-jumbo. This is like North Korea tier brainwashing.

>>6136159

Read the news.

>>5955344
>0.999... isn't defined in a discrete universe

0.999... is a rational number. By your own definition the rationals as a countable set are discrete.

>>5886591
>>5886814
Plz fuck off with this retarded baby nonsense.

How does a finite section of a number line (0,1) contain an infinite amount of numbers? Is your mind fucking blown yet?

\thread

>>5509405
rest in peace in peace.

>>5380633

>>5280672
>homopaths
>scientists

I don't think you know what science is.

>>5174853
>America is still #1 is science

The LHC would like a word with you

>>5084310
>unverified

I think the word your looking for is "hypothesis". String theory is a collection of scientifc hypothesis.

You are a fucking fag

>>5052814
>implying knowledge for knowledge sake is not a worthwhile goal

>>5045821
>developing new technologies
>science

I don't think you know what science is.

>>5042433
>2012
>religion

>>4979661
>>4979666
>refused to believe science
>thinks there must be some magical explanation

The problem with your shitty reasoning is that we have explained all the shit already. There is no more mystery there. We can actually predict when the energy will disappear and what/when it will return, and explain it in great fucking detail. There are entire libraries on the fucking subject, and thousands of fucking labs to observe that shit.

It is the way the universe operates, and it is understood very very very very very very very well already. All that shit was already discovered and debated over 80 fucking years ago. That shit is not debated any more, it is fucking settled. It is old science by now, and we have already moved on to other questions.

Ya'll need to catch the fuck up.

>>4954002
>literally believes in fantasy
>is proud of it

>>4911313
>slaves

People will never allow human cloning because of stupid people like you.

Slaves? really? That is what you need cloning for? How fucking old are you?

Stop watching so much anime and go get some friends kid. Your isolation have given you a very unhealthy mental state.

>>4895266
The universe appears locally probabilistic to us. There is no way for us to escape this probabilistic nature (locally).

However, the more information we have (the bigger system) the less probabilistic things are. Eventually, when we have taken into account the whole universe, we have determinism again.

What part of this do you not understand?

>>4251326
>>4251332
Yes, matter can be "destroyed" and "converted" to energy, and visa versa. That is what E=mc^2 means fucktards.

is this /politics? no? get the FUCK OUT

950^0.4

>>3981796
>put hampsters underwater
>calls it science

Putting hampsters underwater is not science. OP is fucking retarded.

What hypothesis are you trying to prove op? How much time you can waste on bullshit?

The only thing you have proved is how retarded you are. Fucking plebian!

>>3962566
>EE

Why don't you just go kill yourself now? All you will ever be is a burden to society, your family, and the world.

>>3951902

>>3933679

1. Dude, what's your point with rationing? No economist says that rationing helps a country get out of a recession. Keynes never said it, Hayek never said it, they merely did it to help with the war effort. It has nothing to do with the economic theory.

2. Germany was suffering from not only a depression, but having to pay back billions of dollars to european countries due to the Treaty of Versailles. In fact, it was Germany's recession that caused them to elect Hitler into power, it was that bad. But Keynesian stimulus turned it around. What does that say?

3. I read the article you gave me about the 1937 recession. Spending didn't drop, but they raised taxes. The article mentioned that a tighter dollar caused the recession, but they went into some bullshit about how that wasn't the federal reserve's fault. I X'ed it out after that.

4. About that source from aei.org: Did YOU even read it?? It was from 1996, and it was complaining that Japan wasn't following Keynes' advice. What exactly are you trying to debate against?

>>3899980

>call him out on having the sense of humor of a 7 year old.

>No fun allowed.jpg

>Science. All the fucking Science.