/sci/ - Science & Math

I have some questions about trans and some theories of mine about trans topics
so how many (finite) numbers do we need to represent enough things? So like trans(finite) theories we say something like N and we say it has size N.
So actually I'll say that's a number 1 (arbitrary).
And I'll say that's also 1.
So basically how many numbers do we need to store in our mind to represent a good number of mathematics.
In itself I could say all of mathematics is itself some number representation, 2.
Or take the definition of an inductive set: 1 and n->n+1, that's just two numbers.
Peano arithmetic, finite number of axioms.
But yet we can clearly produce more number than we can store, so actually we have a finite ability to produce new numbers.
So how exactly is this trans property possible and what are the depths and impications?
Even the size of the numbers we can hold is limited because a 2 digit number is just an ordered pair of two numbers.

>>12620889
It's your own problem if you can't realize how hypocritical you are.
What are the two most common things throughout philosophy and the works of philosphers?
>>12620893
>hurr durr muh literalists

inventing complexity is just a means to obfuscate the truth about truth, in that, there is none.
Kant was right.
Socrates was right.
Descartes was right.
Godel was right.
I am right.
all you can do is cry more.
just watch as your cognitive dissonance protects your fragile ego.
>inb4 low IQ jannies can't into foundational arguments for math and science
This is math and science related and you can't hide from that.

trust what's objectively true.
what is objective? i don't know faggot.

>low IQ schizos self masturbating
Answer this question correctly: what is math?