/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11938467
>Did not claim any mechanism for gravity, merely presented equations for describing it

This is all you had to post desu. Everything else is irrelevant (because it's foundation is based on this faulty description).

>>11938535
>we neglect to define the pressure wave in the electromagnetic field
A wave is the action of a field in the first place.

>>11938526
>>11938535

A scalar wave is not a "wave". It's compression/rarefaction of the medium. "Death Ray" was coined by fake news of the day (not much has changed about the same publication that posted said falsehood).

>>11938472
>warping spacetime is possible
Space and time have no properties to be warped

>FTL would be feasible.
Light doesn't travel, it's induced to exist.

>>11938542

>you can indeed couple em fields with spacetime
Explain the difference between the two, try not to take 100 posts like the last person I asked.

>>11214272
>It's true though. You can't actually answer that question. You haven't impacted the values of the public, contributed to science, caused social change or even really uplifted your fan base.

I am not Ken Wheeler. What fan base do you speak of?

>>11214283
>distance
>curvature

Those are what geometrical structures have, yes. What geometrical structure does space exhibit?

>>10959962
>at least berzerkfag hasn't been posting here recently
hahahahahahahaha

>>10959953
>no auto-bans for Electric Universe retards
>these literal cult victims

So you despise cults despite thinking exactly like a cult member? Yeah, please tell us more about your harrowing journey in warding off random people on an anonymous imageboard.

>>10850617
Ooo Ooo, can I has a meme too? Lolz!

>>10786110
>word "fractal" not to be found
>>10786212
>>10786122
>>10786052
>when you're so assblasted from a previous argument that you gaslight anyone with the same ideas thinking they're the same person.
He's not berserkfag, I am. Am I being a good tenant in your rent free head?

Also to stay on topic, he's right. Time does not exist

>>10786228
Also that something that doesn't change persists through the illusion of change. For instance you are still "you" even if you break a bone, get a disease, grow older etc. What subsists in the universe is "being" which is uncreated. Change only occurs in that which is created, that which did not exist beforehand. Whatever that was was not "nothing", it also was "being something". It was not generated because then it would be generated from nothing. So there was no "beginning" whatsoever and therefore no change. It is still very much "the universe", "being the universe" and nothing will change this.

>>10773593
>Bill Gaede the traitor spy who stole tech patents from AMD and Intel for south american countries and was expelled from the US.

About the only thing he's "right" about is how his simplification of how magnetism/light works, but I'm giving him extra credit on those only because he's an engineer. He doesn't really go in depth though.

>>10478096
>Imagine looking through the telescope at a quasar blasting its braphole, and not thinking to yourself "hmm, wish I had some way to measure the output of that energy so that I can determine if it was a displacement/transformation of energy elsewhere in this system I believe to be closed. Hmm, also wish I could actually do that without knowing the total energy in this 'closed' system"

Define energy. Other then that your post is spot on.

>>10478391
This is how CERN and Elon Musk gets billions of dollars to do nothing. Paid to chase shadows.

>>10478721
Lol what a weenie.

>>10478767
It ended how it started and progressed. You agreeing with the group herd mentality. Did you expect the group to tell you to not listen to what they say? How else would they get paid?

>>10470662
density of what?

>>10462657
>>10462660
>>10462665
>>10462669
>>10462675
>>10462730
>>10462748
>>10463282
A "wave" is what something does. Not a thing.

>>10356220
Because from nothing come nothing.

>>10315946
Quantity of what?

>>10291570
What process are you going to use to deny what I've stated and form your own hypothesis? How are you going to test that hypothesis?

>>10197012
>>10197130
>>10197160
I'm not Ken, I just think he's right because he fucking cites all his shit and has a shitload of information regarding the subject. What he says is similar to what Eric Dollard and the electrical engineers of the past said. Protip though. He DOES browse /p/ and /x/ on occasion and only in threads you'd expect him to show up in.

>>10118716
No one know, not joking either.

>>10118726
Without magnetism the earth would be flat.Thank magnetism for propping your dumbass up.
>>10118732
>Magnetism is caused by electrons seeking balance with there surroundings.\
A pressure mediation yes, but "electrons" don't exist. >>10118766 sort of has it right and you did say more or less the same thing but "charges" of what?

>So magnets are caused by an electron differential and they want to suck up other electrons to balance the difference. Same as grav in the since that shit sticks together. But not really the same.
They are both "dielectric acceleration". One is coherent, the other not so much.

>>10118750
>>10118729

Absolutely rent-free.

>>10112289
>emitted
There's another abstraction that doesn't exist, but maybe we'll touch up on that later

>"ionizing radiation has no properties or attributes currently accessible by our means, thus is nothing" so fuckit - go home u nihilist.

That's not even close to what I was saying. I mean that "time" and "space" have no properties or attributes because they literally don't have any. "Time" is a measurement, measurements have no properties. "Space" is pressure, it's is literally no different than the atmosphere other than it is at a "lower pressure".

>they mean everything,
They have as much meaning as you give them, doesn't mean they have a basis in reality. It's the same as saying "unicorns have meaning". Well yeah they do to a fiction novel writer, but not to the universe.