/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15502610
>I don't get the relevance.
On a more ESOTERIC note, sir. Also...I could rebuttle virtually every line you posted, so if you want "Fuck you.", I can feed you it.

https://youtu.be/5ChRM4CEWyg

This specific subject touches on my personal research as well as linked. I totes get what he meant...youre appearing too autistic to abstract broader/higher/fundemental axioms from lowest "commonly used definitions using words not invented until the 20th century". Like claming everyone in history was wrong because they didnt use string theory wave-functions to describe everything, like dunces, ammI right?