/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9909708
>gravity is applying more force
An acceleration is not a force. You are applying resistance to an acceleration.

>>9054958
>You have to have faith in the scientific methods used to determine the Earth is round and you have to have faith or believe in the people who made those scientific discoveries/proofs.

this is wrong. faith is not necessary when actual testable provable facts are available. Faith is only for things that you cant prove, and don't have evidence.

>>9024891
so do you believe in literally everything that can be possible? does your cosmology include belief in everything until it has been proven not to exist?

And if not they why do you cherry pick some un-provable/not-proven things to believe in and not others?

do you believe that there is a race of pink unicorn gods that exist in a different dimension and never interact with our universe? Because if you don't believe in the pink unicorn gods then you're cherry picking one unproven/unprovable thing to believe in over others for literally no logical reason.

>>8986316
Stupid questions do not exist, but inquisitive idiots do.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as calculus and physics, is in fact, real analysis, or as I've recently
taken to calling it,
\left( \mathbf R,\, +,\, \times,\, \leqslant,\, \left| \cdot \right|,\, \tau \,=\, \left\{ A \,\subset\, \mathbf R
\mid \forall x\,\in\, A,\, \exists \varepsilon \,>\, 0,\, \left] x \,-\, \varepsilon,\, x \,+\, \varepsilon\right[
\,\subset\, A \right\},\, \bigcap_{\begin{array}{c} A \,\sigma \text{-algebra of}\, \mathbf R \\ \tau \,\subset\, A
\end{array}} A,\, \ell \right)-analysis. Calculus is not a branch of mathematics unto itself, but rather another application
of
a fully functioning analysis made useful by topology, measure theory and vital R-related properties comprising a full number
field as defined by pure mathematics.

Many mathematics students and professors use applications of real analysis every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar
turn of events, the application of real analysis which is widely used today is often called "Calculus", and many of its users
are not aware that it is merely a part of real analysis, developed by the Nicolas Bourbaki group.

There really is a calculus, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the field they use. Calculus is the
computation process: the set of rules and formulae that allow the mathematical mind to derive numerical formulae from other
numerical formulae. The computation process is an essential part of a branch of mathematics, but useless by itself; it can
only function in the context of a complete number field. Calculus is normally used in combination with the real number field,
its topology and its measured space: the whole system is basically real numbers with analytical methods and properties added,
or real analysis. All the so-called calculus problems are really problems of real analysis.

>>8978110
>>8978105

>>8971932
wrong

from the perspective of a reference frame that is moving at the speed of light every point in the universe is collocated and things observed from that reference frame appear not to be moving forward in time.

>>8761193
>426ppm
WRONG
R
O
N
G

https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/weekly.html

>>8751584