/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3991854

>>3986197
Nope.

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-10-rejuvenated-stem-cells-coaxed-centenarian.html
http://www.theage.com.au/technology/sci-tech/drugs-may-let-us-live-to-150-20111016-1lrm5.html
http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/forever-young/manhattan-beach-project-end-aging-2029
http://www.ted.com/themes/might_you_live_a_great_deal_longer.html
http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/07/sierra-sciences-working-towards.html
http://www.sens.org/sens-research/research-themes
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3329065877451441972#
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101128/full/news.2010.635.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/nov/28/scientists-reverse-ageing-mice-humans
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-06-biologists-yeast-cells-reverse-aging.html
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-06-dna-reverse-premature-aging.html

>>3986198
>I hope you're talking about a near-zero-g structure and not one that spins fast enough to produce anything like 1g?
At least 0.05Gs.

>While a new asteroid belt consisting of plants would be cool, I doubt the economical feasibility of it.
We're talking about building a goddamn Ringworld. Current economics will have nothing to do with it if we have the knowledge and ability to do such an ultrastructure.