/sci/ - Science & Math

I'm gonna leave this here

tell me about woman's brain

>>12770818
Higher IQ

https://www.bitchute.com/video/aPz9lZy5H3im/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EiY9w951uSg/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SHeokbGUtC0/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zyiEuLb95LfB/

>>12343475
>implying it doesn't prove sexual dimorphism, and that women are dumber than men

Are females the nonwhites of the genders?

>>10392887

>muh discrimination

they have a different kind of brain. ITS A FACT

>>9882627 Females have a nigger tier level of intelligence, they just act out of instinct with out comprehending what they're actually doing.

>>9846516 Women shouldn't even be in universities in the first place. Pic related.

>>9846516 Women shouldn't even be in collages in the first place. Pic related.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YruxhWO8QSY

>>9841785

>>9806601

Daily reminder women are inferior both mentally and physically.

>>9753382

>>8961562
>First off, volcanism does drop global temperatures, but that is only for a short amount of time.
Again, very dishonest. Very very dishonest. The cooling effect kills much life, yes?, or do I need to google it bitch? Because you wrote here.
>>8961554
>Also, I might as well bring it up since you're so obsessed with geological history, you should know that times at which CO2ppm has been extremely high in Earth's past is correlated with mass extinction events, including the P/T extinction which was likely due to massive bouts of volcanic activity spanning millions of years, dumping enormous quantities of CO2 into the atmosphere.
That it is about co2. The fact is this. First you have massive meteors hitting the Earth. Mass extinction happen. Then, you have volcanos going off, because of the meteors, that cools down the earth killing all life, EVEN if it is for a short time, it kills life, do I need to google it? THEN, after most of life is dead, you have the change in co2. The mass extinction is not caused by co2. Even though it also killed of life. Very very dishonest.

Are these true?

>>8745243
Oh jesus, here we go...

>The largest issue you have is that your first two studies listed directly contradict each other.
Sigh. Wrong.
>Read it.
Not off to a good start.

>it is only meant as a measure of whether someone is retarded.
Sigh. Wrong again.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=What+is+iq+used+to+measure

>SAT results are because dumb girls are more likely to take the SAT then dumb guys skewing the results.
>then
Your first reasonable point (even a broken clock is right twice a day). However the explanation to this is that girls are dumber then guys generally.
>Look at the graph
>>8745181

>75% is a sociological issue and like the rest of your studies
You really believe that strongly.

>Butthurt bs

>Have fun in your kinky D/s relationship with an inferior.
I do and will continue to ;D