/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15453333
>most people on this board still think the moon landing was fake
i hope this is just a troll bait

>>14552506
>LCROSS
I meant LRO, the only moon orbiter we have right now

Took pics of all the Apollo sites, but of course conspiratards just say they're shooped

>>12009370
Not really footprints, but recently LRO (Lunar Reconnaisance Orbiter) was able to image the landing sites. Just search for LRO moon landing images. NASA has a ton of them.

You can't see it from Earth because telescopes just aren't that powerful.

>>11287221
Much, much longer. Human footprints will last for around 1 million years on the moon, and other equipment like the lunar landers, probe remains, etc, will also likely last several hundred thousand years at least.

The pyramids are about 10k years old, and already in very poor shape. They may last another 10k-15k at most, maybe more if we work to preserve them.

To put it into perspective, boot prints on the Moon will last longer than the entire human species has existed on Earth.

>>10540506
If they were really ambitious with their dick art, yes.

>>8704424

>>7966017

>>7934045

Apollo 12's third stage is still up there, and has been imaged and catalogued.

http://news.discovery.com/space/history-of-space/what-happened-to-all-the-saturn-v-rocket-stages-140116.htm

As have the landing sites themselves. This whole thread is a troll of trolls. Or idiots. Or lunatics. Dealer's choice.

The landing can be independently verified with powerful telescopes.