/sci/ - Science & Math

When a person with qualifications like these;
>Masters in Physics
>Doctorate in Particle Physics
>Oxford Fellow
>Professor of Particle Physics
>Professor of Nuclear Physics
>Worked for DARPA
>Worked for DESY on the Electronsynchrotron as a high energy physicist
>Worked for CERN on the Large Hadron Collider as a high energy physicist
Says something like this; "5G is and always was intended primarily as a directed energy weapon, it's data transfer capabilities are secondary to this purpose. The effects are already being seen in the widespread behavioral changes within humans exposed to the passive electromagnetism which our linear understanding of physics cannot yet explain".

Why shouldn't we believe them? I don't want to discuss the science of 5G. We thought this person was intelligent enough to work on the most secretive and expensive scientific projects ever built, as well as literally educating the next generation in physics, yet we do not trust them when it comes to specific subjects which we push into the realm of pseudoscience. Pls explain.