/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10785188
>perception of duration
is a mirage real?

>>10785124
>we disproved one theory of the aether and so that disproves all of them
Rofl I'm with this >>10785142 poster

>>10711959
I was just saying that while magnetism is a sort of force, gravity does not in fact imbue shit with energy. That is, in the sense that magnets change shit while matter changes gravity.

If magnets/magnetism change matter and matter changes "gravity"(still no explanation), then magnetism is the fucking cause of gravity. A change in quality isn't a force by the way. The only way to cause a change in a quality is obviously to have an absence of that quality which you're referring to. So you have:
Magnetism: the qualities, dimensionality, manifest
Inertia/electrostatics/(the absence of magnetism which is obviously not magnetism): the absence of qualities/manifestation (which is not something specific or even determinable).
"gravity": An interplay of the two. Which is why the planet doesn't fly apart nor implode upon itself. A "well" of the absence of qualities, which is why it affects everything and eventually makes it succumb to it (you die, you live, things grow and shrink, gas condenses/sublimates). A disparity of a medium.

>>10711975
>All waves are the same thing happening in different mediums
>It's a wave in "spacetime," whatever the fuck that is, as if that would somehow effect my argument in any way.

It does affect your "argument" because you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. You're using a buzzword because "space" and "time" has no actual basis in reality! If a wave happens in a medium (you said so yourself) then It's "filled space", an incommensurable medium that has absolutely nothing to do with time, "space", "spacetime", or any other "quantified" bullshit.

>>10699111
>Thinks climate change is a conspiracy

Conspiracy? No it's literally a theory based on a false premise and no control. It's not even worthy of being called a "conspiracy" because there is no basis in reality to it. In other words, there is no substance to it that is worthy of being discussed, it's unscientific and has absolutely no empirical evidence to back it up. Now on your way you hysteric charisma seeker. Go repost your rehashed "go back to /pol/" line in the next climate change thread.

>Thinks other people are responsible for the problems you create

My power bill jumping 30 percent right after a mandated bill requiring power companies to supply 15 percent of energy by renewable resources (of which are dictated by the government)? I would agree with you only if I had the chance to vote on the stupid fucking bill, but I didn't. So yeah it is their fault. Want to get your last word in before not reading my posts again?

>>10663379
Is Time quantified?

It is by definition, it's the only thing that actually gives any "meaning" to time in the fist place. Even though "time" itself as an entity/modality/phenomena does not exist we reify it using quantification (1-2-3 o'clock 4 o'clock, rock). Go ahead and try to think of time without using numbers and math, can't be done. Time is ONLY a quantification, but of what we don't know. You could say it's "part of the universe", but how can time have a basis in reality to something that never ends nor begins?

>>10525867
>if the earth was hollow it would not have the gravity it does due to reduced mass

How much "gravity" is at the center of earth?

>>10525878

>It is very definitely solid.
>only longitudinal compressions and rarefactions measured end to end in p waves

why not s waves?

>>10460416
>Prove global warming is not real.

>assume something is real first then waste time disproving it

Not science. Extraordinary claims require evidence. First prove global warming is real, then prove that it's not a natural process. They tried that by correlating CO2 emissions with temperature and then found out that it LAGS behind temperature by 800-1000 years, indicating that temperature is actually the cause.
All you have going for you is induced hysteria caused by fake news which interprets natural phenomena as some kind of global threat.

>>10437726
>had trouble making friends in high school
>didn't do extracurriculars
>currently a NEET
>never attended a "party"/kickback/whatever
>have a distant relationship with father
>>10437635
>They literally hold a status that they can no longer obtain and because the jealosy and materialism is so ingrained into the envious person, this fuels a psychosis in them that tells them they have "more" "stuff" than the virgin. They don't account for the knowledge or wisdom of them because like I said, they're materialists.

Like clockwork. 1/5 by the way, what good are extra curricular when you're self-employed?

>>10428765
>and its why philosophy is a fucking waste, at least science can make predictions

>We don't know shit, but we'll mislead you into believing we're right by reifying shadows.

Sure whatever, just don't start preaching it as truth at my front doorstep on Saturday morning.

>>10417925
>many sci fi movies use this trope where light is used to create a image without an medium interference. which are as vivid as realtiy.

What do you think "matter" actually is?
>atoms
Which are what? Made by what?

>what do you think is holding us back. what would we need to resolve to make it happen

You are a hologram. If not then prove that you are not.