/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5312657

you're in the wrong place

>>>/g/aymen

>>5305554
>Really? Are you asserting that I cannot use pointers to cause havoc at the hardware level?
>
>How the fuck do you think viruses work anyway?
so much stupidity...

I assume that you're a CS major who doesn't belong here and knows nothing on how a computer works. All programs (Java/C/etc) have there own virtual address space and they can't break out of them with pointers. Virus work by finding flaws in the sandboxer whether that's the OS or the Java VM and there has been a fuck ton of those with Java.

>>5228527
>computer science majors
>suck at maths and science
yep

>CS majors
gtfo >>>/g/

>CS
>science
>math

pick one

</thread>

>>4924815
>>4925524
>>4927149
Jelly mad, assblasted autists.

Only computer science trash adores undergraduate category theory

>specialized degree
>computer science

pick one

>>4890372
thread smells of CS majors

<span class="math">l_i(x)[/spoiler] is zero at <span class="math">x_n≠x_i[/spoiler] and one at <span class="math"> x_i[/spoiler]
Clearly <span class="math">l^*(x)=w(x)/(x-x_i)[/spoiler] satisfies the zero property
<span class="math">l^*(x_i)=∏_{n≠i}(x_n-x_i)[/spoiler]

∑_{j=0}^{j≤n}∏_{k=0}^{k≤n} (x_i-x_k≠j) in every term of the sum with j≠i there exist (x_i-x_i)=0 in the product leaving only j==i <span class="math">∏_{k=0}^{k≤n} (x_i-x_k≠i)==l^*(x_i)[/spoiler] hence <span class="math">w'(x)=l^{*}(x_i)[/spoiler] and clearly <span class="math">l^*(x)/l^*(x_i)[/spoiler] satisfy both property so <span class="math">l(x)=l^*(x)/l^*(x_i)=w(x)/w'(x)(x-x_i)[/spoiler] ∎

>>4890372
thread smells of CS majors

l_i(x) is zero at x_n≠x_i and one at x_i
Clearly l*(x)=w(x)/(x-x_i) satisfies the zero property
l*(x_i)=∏(x_n-x_i) with n≠i
w'(x_i)=<span class="math">∑_{j=0}^{j≤n}∏_{k=0}^{k≤n} (x_i-x_k≠j)<span class="math">
in every term of the sum with j≠i there exist (x_i-x_i)=0 in the product leaving only j==i
∏_{k=0}^{k≤n} (x_i-x_k≠i)==l*(x_i)
clearly l*(x)/l*(x_i) satisfy the one property so l(x)=l*(x)/l*(x_i)=w(x)/w'(x)(x-x_i) ∎[/spoiler][/spoiler]

>But seriously, is this the kind of shit they ask on interviews?

What do you expect?