/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11716380
What is the force that binds matter? I'd like to be educated.

>>11040023
>We came this close to wiping out all life in Europe

>>11028954
cumbrain

>psuedo

>>10849172
>demanding reputable longitudinal studies from across both sexes, races, and age groups, to actually prove your diet is suitable to sustain and thrive off of, both in adolescence and adulthood, is "sealioning"
Yeah, I too wish the liberal bias for racial egalitarianism could disprove divergent evolution in homo sapiens but it seems we're both shit out of luck :^)

>>10848804
nice counter point, on a thread about the quality of the board being utter shit

>>10365501
Let's check if your IQ remains the same when I smash your skull with a baseball bat

Alright, a few in a row:
From "Beyond Perceptualism: Introduction to the Special Issue"
( https://sci-hub .tw/10.1111/1746-8361.12106 )

>(Page 1, 3rd paragraph) According to ‘strong perceptualism’, emotions are (a special kind of) perceptions (see, e.g., James 1884; Tappolet 2000; Prinz 2004). ‘Weak perceptualism’, by contrast, states that emotions are merely analogous to perceptions (see, e.g., de Sousa 1987; Elgin 1996; Goldie 2000; Johnston 2001;
Does it mean that emotions can be receptors while some argue that emotions are only apparently like receptors?

>(Page 3, 1st paragrapgh) Perceptual and judgemental theories share the core idea that emotions are cognitive states with an intentional content that represents the world as being a certain way and can, therefore, be assessed for correctness.
What the fuck does "intentional content" mean?
Is "assessed for correctness" the big brained version of "It's likely right"?

>(Page 6, 6th paragraph) Emotions seem to depend much more strongly on certain characteristics of the subject experiencing them than perceptions do
Does this mean that the subject that's suffering from certain emotions are more likely to have a unique experience because some characteristics of the subject may influence itself, than perceptions?

>>10226564
>tfw iq too low to go to uni

>>10202663
>That's not math

>>10138404

>>10123130
>physics

>>10055724
exhaust gases expanding into the atmosphere surrounding the engines

Why are brainlets so infatuated with the idea of merging human consciousness with AI?

>>9985335

>>9979276
>what is probability theory

>>9953069
>Ramanujan's crazy formulas are at a spiritual level of beauty

>>9947946
>Blaming the woman for being a single mom
>Not taking a minute to think about how a woman becomes a single mom in the first place
>The men are innocent!

I'm not one to spit leftist rhetoric, but you and your retarded facebook-tier propaganda are clearly showing your prejudices and intellectual laziness.
The fathers are equally guilty, and if it weren't for subhuman degenerate men incapable of establishing a stable family and keeping a steady source of income, this issue wouldn't be as prevalent

>three doors
>behind 2 doors are a goat, behind 1 door is a car
>host reveals that there is a goat behind door 1
>you now choose either door 2 or 3
>since one goat has already been revealed, and one door already opened, you now have 2 doors, one with a car and one with a goat

>its not 50/50

What the fuck is this shit? Im no math nerd, and I certainly dont understand the probability behind it but in terms of basic logic this seems utterly retarded.
>Muh the chances are still 33.3% even though the third option has been removed from the game

>>9925236
>all scientists and areas of science are equal

>>9900366
>Hey guys, I was just pretending to be retarded, why did you call me a retard when I was just pretending?

>>9882006
clearly he did confuse them, since the only way rotational velocity would be increased is by swapping the gears.

His set-up is a gear ratio that maximizes the rotational period, as if that was the goal here

>>9807769
>block letter writing wasn't even a thing a hundred years ago

>this thread