/sci/ - Science & Math

>>1278032
>My argument has yet to be contradicted properly.

No, your argument has yet to be asserted properly. You're talking completely within classical or Newtonian physics, where gravity is a CONSERVATIVE FIELD:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_vector_field

Speaking to the top of the pyramid:
>>1277000
You have not formulated a damn thing analytically, and it follows that you cannot calculate a damn thing. An English teacher told me, "You don't understand a subject until you can write about it," and my PhD advisor told me, "You don't understand a theory until you can calculate it." You've offered no equations so express what you're talking about except W=mgh. So that's your genius breakthrough: W=mgh?!

Like Julia Sweeney said when she learned what quantum mechanics really says: "Deepak Chopra is full of shit!"

Speaking from the United States, our society has converged on a stable social agreement or convention -- to conflate a variety of contradictory ideas of gods into a single name "God" -- with the capitalization implying a proper name for a unique thing (like the "Internet").

Then the majority of people defend the conflation itself, as a condition of being a good member of society. Conversely, pointing out the conflation is considered socially unacceptable -- as if pointing out the conflation is rude, and possibly dangerous to the stability of society.

Capitalized, "God" is the name of the conflation.