/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5974715
O-okay

What happens if you attempt to push light, momentarily accelerating it into a speed faster than light?

>>5740561
How can we justify otherwise then? You are merely a universal posture, and by the fact of things expressing the way they could think they are, is indicative of
A: Such being true to their extent (All forms of me do not exist), and we are synonymous with nature across the board, or
B: We hold the keys of unjustification, which in turn leads to the premise that it is only bias that depicts what interpretation we take, and by taking one are we fufilling our 'quota' of distribution of being unjustified

Which leads me to the point of when being entirely unjustified in an action, are you the most justified(justification=means/basis) in the extent of you are acting by no premise that is your own, not to say that you are apart from it, the universe, but subjecting yourself to it's bounds, which to it, simply by empirical evidence, is/are unjustified.

So, what is logic? It's a shrouded epiphany of not fully undefined, and as such illogical; and a fallacy? In the nature of true logic, an only partial subjection.

>yfw

>>5653937

>tfw I need help with calculus and I see a bunch of this pic along side the topic

>that feel when you scored 99/100 on a test
>you could had full marks if it wasn't for that one shitty mistake

>>4992319
Well you could technically increase the size of your arms/legs with weightlifting b...

>mfw I'm now imagining someone training their cock by weightlifting