[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9826943 [View]
File: 163 KB, 392x199, Convolucion_Funcion_Pi.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9826943

A convolution product of two random variable randomly distributed

>> No.1311587 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 163 KB, 392x199, Convolucion_Funcion_Pi.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1311587

Why do some sources (wikipedia) define convolution as
<div class="math"> \int_{0}^{t} f(s) g(t-s) ds </div>
It seems like whenever it comes down to application, we use
<div class="math"> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(s) g(t-s) ds </div>

Can someone explain this discrepancy?

>> No.946160 [View]
File: 163 KB, 392x199, Convolucion_Funcion_Pi.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
946160

>>946139
You don't know what convolution is, do you...? Tak a look at this gif, I could explain you the main theory, but I think this is the easiest way to feel how this is possible.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]