[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12630722 [View]
File: 2.54 MB, 1280x720, ugandan energy plan.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12630722

>>12630613
>>12630703
Unless the Ugandans have a space program I haven't heard of then none of this shit is on-topic even remotely. Talk about spaceflight or stop posting.

>> No.8478292 [View]
File: 2.54 MB, 1280x720, infinite_energy.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8478292

>>8478201

>> No.7896514 [View]
File: 2.54 MB, 1280x720, toast.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7896514

>>7896511

>> No.7433946 [View]
File: 2.54 MB, 1280x720, 1438357533310.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7433946

Is this science legit /sci/?

>> No.7347874 [View]
File: 2.54 MB, 1280x720, 1431815066358.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7347874

>>7347780
>Posting low quality gif

>> No.7030606 [View]
File: 2.54 MB, 1280x720, Infinite Power.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7030606

reminded me of this

>> No.6906727 [View]
File: 2.54 MB, 1280x720, african_space_project.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6906727

>>6905383
>>6905388
It has its own webm too.

>> No.6892673 [View]
File: 2.54 MB, 1280x720, perpetual motion engine.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6892673

>> No.6849449 [View]
File: 2.54 MB, 1280x720, .webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6849449

How is this clearly neither science nor math related thread that violates several rules still here more than 1 hour after its creation?

Fucking step it up guys. You have to report shit like this or /sci/ will drown in idiocy and shitposting.

>> No.6819340 [View]
File: 2.54 MB, 1280x720, .webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6819340

>>6818745
>I suspect you know that already
Indeed, it was just mockery. Thank you for suspecting this instead of treating me like an idiot.
>It's a useful, casual, introductory resource into fields related to intelligence; there is no reason to deny it that status.
Yes, there is. Every single lesswrong follower I have discussed with so far had ridiculous beliefs, zero evidence to back up any of their claims, always ignored my scientific arguments and insulted me instead. It is misleading misinformation, not appropriate introduction to the highly complex area of AI. If you are willing to invest so much time into it, you might as well read books and do some courses.

Maybe I just had bad luck and met the wrong people. I am sure not everyone in the lesswrong community is an ignorant who claims that his baseless beliefs are rational and everything else is not. But honestly, the entire thing just seems silly to me. Trust me, I understand their position as I too once believed in an AI based singularity but I grew out of it when I was in my early teens.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]