/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9870348
>a sub-par crank
This is an example of you having an opinion and then acting as if your opinion was true because acting otherwise would put you into an uncomfortable state of cognitive dissonance, or else you are trolling and I will die the same horrible death.

>who don't even know how to compute a limit.
I do know how to do it though. You're probably referring to me looking up the steps for the limit the other day. Not having it fresh in my memory after not doing for 10+ years is different than not knowing how to do it. You are the one who knowledge base is deficient.

>want to be treated as a god
This is also not right. I do want to be treated as him who I am, but my historical complaint has been that I am treated worse than an average person despite having proven my superiority to the average man in many ways and on many occasions. Just because you are too stupid to understand the intense technical nuance developed in my research program, and are too apathetic to have made a concerted effort at some point over the last decade, that takes away nothing from entitlement to take credit for the development of that nuance. So you see, there are two issues: credit for who I am and credit for what I've done. My complaints, thus far in my life, are almost totally dedicated to the latter.

Reply="Look whose research program was productive and look whose wasn't"