/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3892299

both of the decriptions fit me very well, depending on a lot of things.

i will use the N to come up with some crazy concept, and then i will use the S to put it to use.

i can tell when i am doing this, its really wierd.

regarding INTPs:
>Where did they come up with that train of thought? It's hard to follow, because they're intuitives. Intuitive types tend to make complex connections and bridge gaps that others might not see.

this fits me really well, i think i might be INTP but i am really adept at using my sensing function.

>>3891985

>Maybe you just have a greater ability at listening in to your subconcios than most and thus your concious mind is presented with conflicting views, which would not normally happen to most people.

this might be true, its hard to explain... i guess ill try.

ill look at... lets say... a math problem. i will not have to "THINK" about it, but it seems like my subconscious mind will work it out, and will tell my conscious mind the answer. people will be like "how the hell did you figure it out?" ill just be like "shit, idk."

not even just a math problem, ANY type of problem.

(great problem solving is a quality of ISTPs)

pic related, i took 3 different (online) tests, these two, and another one. i got IXTP (X= 50% S and 50% N) on the other one.

>>3706919

correct, im just very well developed in both iN and S

depending on what test i take, or how i am feeling that day, it changes

<----- see