[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.16198792 [View]
File: 234 KB, 1024x1019, peer review.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16198792

>>16198369
They don't, the peer review system insures that the much more common 100IQ midwits are in control of all scientific narratives.

>> No.16144772 [View]
File: 234 KB, 1024x1019, peer review.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16144772

>>16119943

>> No.16137887 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 234 KB, 1024x1019, peer review.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16137887

>>16127840
If something is peer reviewed that means it got a sign off from Gang DEI, which in turn doesn't necessarily mean that its wrong, but does guarantee that its stupid because Gang DEI is midwits.

>> No.16037787 [View]
File: 234 KB, 1024x1019, peer review.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16037787

Biologist Allan Savory says that peer review is ruining science
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3eMWLG7Rro
What does /sci/ think about this issue?

>> No.16005862 [View]
File: 234 KB, 1024x1019, peer review.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16005862

>>15995996
the peer review system was instituted explicitly for that purpose, in order to insure that collusive lying would always prevail over scientific truths

>> No.15945659 [View]
File: 234 KB, 1024x1019, peer review.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15945659

>>15944914
>peer review

>> No.15847028 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 234 KB, 1024x1019, peer review.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15847028

>>15845988
Absolutely

>> No.15809570 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 234 KB, 1024x1019, 1689803660944213.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15809570

academia is for low iqs

>> No.15780866 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 234 KB, 1024x1019, peer review.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15780866

>>15776872
>It is a circle jerk
its a consensus of midwits, the average reviewer is guaranteed to be too low iq to understand the most intelligent ideas. the peer review system means that the highest iq outlier brains will always be left out in the cold

>> No.15691864 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 234 KB, 1024x1019, peer review.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15691864

>>15689570
>the herd
thats how peer review works

>> No.15574170 [View]
File: 234 KB, 1024x1019, peer review.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15574170

Is the peer review system good for science or is it a hindrance?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]