/sci/ - Science & Math

>homo erect
sounds pretty gay desu senpai

>>8995284
>So it could've been an ancient fairy, or mermaid, or satyr?
You're just making up bullshit right now. That doesn't remotely follow from what I said.

>He most likely meant "actually useful for anything other than climbing in trees."
Aaand surprise surprise, literally all great apes have thumbs like that too.

>So they admit to intelligent design when man is the designer?
Funny how humans making things doesn't imply that someone made everything. If scientists had a problem with the idea that humans made things, we wouldn't be using computers to talk to morons like you.

>So I should take any yahoo with a PhD's wild extrapolations seriously?
No. Unfortunately for you, you lack the intelligence and knowledge to tell the difference between reasonable and unreasonable reconstructions. It's a heavy burden you bear, being incapable of knowing whether those more learned than you are bullshitting. But the real trouble only arises when you lose sight of this, and believe that you DO know something that you don't.

>But we're not dealing with humans, are we?
We, in fact, are. Members of the genus Homo are by definition humans.

>8868082
>we're not /pol/, we're /sci/!
>we win and you lose every time because we're /sci/ and you're a SJWtard
>yes we are definitely /sci/ and not /pol/
>get off our board you non-/sci/
>how do you do, fellow kids?

seen it all before in the (((climatology))) threads. yawn.

>>8639491
>zero (0!) evidence for this
>0! = 1

>>8619638
you know you're near rock bottom when you're plagiarizing fucking Lorrie Goldstein

>>8474503
>theory first becoming popular coincides with earliest appearance of evidence supporting the theory
>must be a conspiracy!
now I want you to think long and hard about what you've done and how you got to where you are today.