/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6687491
Physics. Because you often work with engineers, whom want to rape you.

"There is nothing relative about the sexual nature of the engineers. Their proclivity for anal rape causes many reach projects to end abruptly." - Albert Einstein

How do particles become "grouped" or "paired" in Entanglement? Is it by touching?

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/ban-creationism-and-intelligent-design-science-classroom-federal-law/pNY6mCBg

We have a week to get 55,275 signatures!
Can you help /sci/? Registration only requires an email and zip code. Not sure how real it has to be?

Thanks!!!

>>5874024
>Ad hominems

>Can't actually refute any of Krausses points (or modern cosmlogy in general)

You are such a sad troll. Here let me help you.

This is a good link that explains basic cosmology and shit for the layman (like you):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ImvlS8PLIo

Here is a a layeman link from NASA, confiming that we know the universe is flat: http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_shape.html

This stuff should be easy enough for you to follow. Good luck!

>>5104864
Nope. Schodingers cat actually is a thought experimnet against trying to use quantum principles for large scale phenomina. Qunatum nature (for the most part) only displays itself on the qunatum scale.

The probablitic nature of quantum mechanics, just says the universe is locally probabaltic, nothing more. How the fuck do you do from locally probablictic to "we are living in a computer"?

The problem is in your logic, you make "jumps" and try to connect totally unconnected concepts. You need to cut that bullshit out.

>>5104869
No idea who that is. She won't get any Nobel prize.

>>3962266
I can explain all of QM to you.....

What in particular do you want to know?

>>3798162
Look at accompanying picture on the wiki page.

They construct a right triangle; hypotheuse = D, side1 = L, side2 = 1/2*v*t'

D is simply calculated from basic 2-d euclidean geometry (THE PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM)

any other questions?

>>3787799
>>3787854
>>3787857
>>3787925
I will be willing to answer questions after I leave the presentation (and I make it back to my office). Unless I go drinking afterwards.

FYI - "Accurate time syncronization of the Beam" - THAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT PART. Probably the part they will be scrutinized the most.

What you and I consider to be of importance in these times seem to be extremely contrasting. Also, you basically proved my point about extroverts being parasitic and deceitful AND showing disregard for others opinions/feelings. ALSO, you are sadly mistaken if you believe any scientist worth honoring was extroverted.

In addition to being one of the greatest thinkers of our time, Einstein was also a ladies' man. This guy fucked a lot of bitches. He cared so little for the bullshit of women that he bet his fucking Nobel prize on his divorce just to shut his bitch up for a while. This man had his priorities straight.

What is your excuse?