/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4707759
>>4707770

>>4654399
Well, I'll be damned. Still, being a scientific study this just shows that abstinence increases testosterone only to a level which is /statistically/ significant, NOT biologically significant.

Also,

>plasma testosterone was unaltered by orgasm

Good to have that on record.

Now that I see this though, it makes perfect sense. Evolutionary if an organism isn't having sex, then increasing the sex drive (via testosterone) is only logical. Taking into consideration that serum testosterone levels were unaffected on an orgasm to orgasm basis (as per above), it's obvious that ejaculating doesn't lower testosterone. Either way you look at it, abstaining is mentally retarded. It's not going to make you manlier or anything, just proportionally more horny.

>>4484173
Well fuck me.

Dem japs sure are crafty...

>>3936479

I don't know how long you've been lurking here, but that is the most startling accurate description of /sci/ I've ever seen.

>>3291783

>>3274803

I've only been loosely monitoring this thread...

But wow /sci/...

>>3267538

>>3220611

Not OP

Thank you very much. My crusty sock count is about to skyrocket.

Took 18 clicks, but I got it.

Canada - North America - North - Noun - Linguistics - Human - Taxonomy - Science - Knowledge - Fact - Information - Sequence - Mathematics - Quantity - Property (Philosophy) - Modern Philosophy - Philosophy

Pic related