/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7170807
By now the wavelength to delay ration of 187.5 * n could verry possibly be a coincidence.
The radio astronomers will have to get more data to be sure. 11 measurements is a pretty small sample.

Maybe, I stated here >>7170781 the signals are produced seismically inside A1 supernova remnant neutron stars.
Those are all of quite similiar mass and diameter wich could explain the similar wavelength to duration delay ratio of the signals?

Or it is simply a spy satelite.

No way in hell that this is E.T.

radio bursts discovered that have a mathamtical pattern and is unable to be explained by what we know about cosmic physics.


http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22630153.600-is-this-et-mystery-of-strange-radio-bursts-from-space.html#.VRwVZtEfVNQ