/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6988943

You're cherry picking. CO2 has been MUCH higher in the past. Without the world dying off.

>>6779909

That's not what this guy said:
>>6779831

But that aside, assume the 94% of solar luminosity at the Paleozoic age, which according to the assumption of their reference is monotonically increasing (and treated linearly).

Meanwhile max temperatures in their graphic stay constant (except for dips now and then). And SkS Boyz say this is because of decreasing CO2 concentration which is countering increasing solar luminosity. Except the decrease is NOT monotonic.

Both solar luminosity and CO2 are INCREASING from about 300 million to 150 million years ago. Yet global temp quickly peaks and stays flat; showing that CO2 ain't driving things.

The Simpleton "Scientists" fail again, with another of their "just so" stories.