/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8135617
Just watched this faghat's spooky physixs ted blab.

He mislead me to believe that a third quantum state could be tied into an entangled pair after they are already split. this is crap. the third particle can only adopt and boost-transmit the original entanglement of the two... right?

More than 1 quantum state can be given at the birth moment of the entanglement, but not afterward. If the third wheel can bring in a second state or even influence the chances of the original state's outcome, then we have faster than light non-randomized intentional information transmittal.

Again, i'm pretty sure the answer is just fuck this guy for the misleading colorcoding.