/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10504334
>>10504375
>>10504333
no u
>>10504426
was out of things to shitpost with
>>10504416
The modelling of one's inner stimulations successfully created a system of intelligence. The evidence is literally inside of you. Well, of course, some people may think these kinds of evidences are subjective. Ironically, they are the ones who are not scientific. What happens, happens. It doesn't make a difference if it's inside your consciousness. Also, it's not like the observations are not reproducible. By far I have not yet seen one poster who asked me how their thinking process cannot be fitted with the model. Not one person even remotely mentioned about the problem with the neural networks and the activation. If you don't understand it, don't shit on it. Fucking sheep.

Even if I completely got the biology wrong, it means I've created a new system of intelligence, which is even a greater achievement. The advices are helpful though.

>inb4 cringe
>inb4 schizo
Did you notice that the words that I just said trigger more emotions in you than, say, if it's the first time you've seen it and it's said by a famous researcher?

Bias is easy to explain. See "short-term memory."