/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11193060
Steam-fags got literally centuries to improve this this technology, they failed. Now solar is cheaper and steam age is finally over.

>>10771987
>solar panels and the toxic chemicals
why always the same stupid lie?
Solar panels are made of absolutely safe everyday materials. Glass, silicon, copper, some glue and an usually an aluminium frame.
Super safe, super easy to recycle.

Atomic power is producing lot's of radioactive and super toxic waste. you can not recycle and you have to safely bury it for millions of years. This is of course impossible.

+++++++++BREAKING+++++++++++++++ ATOMIC POWER IS OUTDATED +++++++++++++++BREAKING+++++++++++

>>10335646
France is basically in the same situation as the US. Old nuclear plants became old and high maintenance. Many will retire in the next decade. Wind and solar are much cheaper so new capacity will be mostly renewable.

>>10160232
Building an atomic power plant is just not a good investment. Planning and building a plant takes decades, it will cost you billions and you don't know if it ever will become operational. Solar wind and natural gas is a sure bet. It's even popular. Building a solar farm can be done in a few weeks.

>>10152426
Why burn money with such useless shit?
Solar plants can be build much cheaper and faster. Solar does not blow up and does not produce radioactive waste.