/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11577161
He's one of the greatest mathematicians of the 20th century, but that's because the 20th century produced shit mathematicians. If he had lived in the 19th century he wouldn't even be in the top 10.

If dubs I will one day prove the Riemann Hypothesis.

>>10169368
Oppenheimer was handsome too, its weird how a small minority of famous physicists and mathematicians are handsome and the vast majority of them are not. I wonder what that would imply? I don't know much about statistical distributions or selection, so I think it probably means most mathematicians and physicists are handsome. I'm a retarded sociopath and I just go with my gut instinct on these things, my frat brothers were REALLY smart like geniuses, that's how they got such good jobs out of college, but those nerd GDI's? Not a chance, jumped halfwits, probably all Jewish too, whites are gorgeous by default, everyone I know whose healthy is beautiful and I refuse to believe otherwise. Anyways this is another Antinous of Mathematics to complement this accurate and not at all pathological mindset that I do really have.

What if his hypothesis be confirmed ou refuted? What are the implications?