/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4697013
>But where can I go?

Nowhere, that's the thing. That's why the market has failed us and the internet needs regulation. When I'm elected state representative I will work hard to put all these mods in jail for cyber bullying, harassment, and discrimination. They think their racist memes and misogyny is funny, and hide behind "muh' property, muh' dick". Just wait until that comes to bite them in the ass. If the manager at Starbucks banned you for "being a faggot", he'd lose his job and get a fine for hate crime.

But when internet mods do it... nothing. That'll change. Since google plans to buy 4chan, the mods need to be especially careful and keep their sausage fingers off the keyboard.

Appeal to scientific consensus is by it's nature, a revolutionary and radical ideology. Science requires constant advancement, constant challenges, and constant rhetoric. Or else it isn't science.

Now it's one thing to call ourselves champions of this clause, and another to actually do it. Most technocrats would be no different then any other system. Advocating stagnation, oppression of the mind, and faulty systems of governance, because anyone who disagrees with them is "stupid". Whether willfully or incidentally. Just like denying the holocaust is illegal in some countries, challenging the status quo could earn you similar jail time under a technocracy. How is that living life by reason?

The appeal to authority is out of cowardice, laziness, and willful ignorance. It's easier to let others decide things for you. And as much as the pseudo intellectuals love to bitch about the uncaring masses ascribing to this, how is letting private industries run our lives any better if not directly worse? 4chan is worst then any government. It holds no accountability, no regulatory process, no democratic elections, no internal investigations. It's just completely unrestricted abuse and bossing around by the mods. And their best fucking argument is "make your own forum, huuur huuur huuur!!!"

So get banned, or leave.
Starvation or slavery.
These are not choices, they are threats. And reactionaries who believe this can be solved by more democracy and populism, are just setting themselves up for failure. Because it is that evil nature of men that always lead us down this road. The only difference between a popular dictatorship, a totalitarian branch of government, or a criminal syndicate of mob bosses... is how it does, it's timing, and the likelihood of collapse.

Why the fuck would I want to go through a worm hole? You know... my problem with a lot of people who value science, is they don't aim for realistic goals within the parameters of physics.

You're thinking about wormholes, I'm thinking about diet pills that don't fuck up your liver so you can eat like a pig and still be thin.

You're thinking about time travel and self propelled fusion energy, I'm thinking about phermones to make Miley Cyrus feel compelled to suck your dick.

Your brand of technology requires more work, not less. Science should be about lessening the burden of suffering on the individual. Less effort, less responsibility, less being denied his most basic desires and needs.