/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10250908
>Care to point out how Nordhaus' analysis is wrong?
I'm not saying he is wrong, and nobody can. It is modelling and we wont know until time passes.
I'm saying all of these models have been consistently wrong since I started hearing about them back in the 70s.
>What historical data and how is it relevant?
>And?
It's quite clear that you are that convinced with your own uni-dimensional model that there is no point in conversing with you

The general trend of the last 6~ thousand years of recorded human history, there have been peaks and troughs of human accomplishment, and decline has been seen when these dips occur