/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15253748
>smoke is bad because... it just is ok

Metaphysics is a branch of philosophy. It's not a "real science", because it never tried to be in the first place.

>>15111436
>you're being dishonest because your argument is correct

>>15102236
>gas that has to be extracted, processed, and shipped is more accessible than solar power

>>15098924
>Nature was right again
>therefore Nature is propaganda
>therefore I can ignore data published in Nature
Deniertard cope. Thanks for conceding.

>>15078511
>it was designed to not collapse, therefore it was an inside job

>>15073103
>What's the confidence interval of the confidence interval?
Dios mio...

>>15008988
You must think it's some kind of trick that the graph has two different time axes too.

>What sorcery is this? How can they switch between thousands of years before present and years in European calendar in the middle of the graph???? You can't have two axes with different labels for the same thing!!!!11
I honestly can't tell if this is high level telling or severe mental deficiency.

>>14842320
>I don't do science anymore.
Dumb and proud.

>>14732113
>It was a rhetorical question.
>I already told you it was a rhetoric question

>>14725153
>brings up Catholic priests
>bullshit gets refuted
>I-I-I don't care about Catholic priests

>>14614229
>kindergarten cliches
>believes in the oldest ancient goat herder cliches in the book

>>14488576
>asks for measurements
>rejects them when they don't give the answer he wanted

>>12731584
>Texas = Globe
The apex of the /pol/tard intellect.

>>12622721
Sweden doesn't recommend masks
>see this proves masks don't work
Sweden does recommend masks
>see this proves masks don't work

>”EINSTEIN’s theory of relativity!”

>>12591717
I don't believe in gravity, I'll jump off a cliff and God will make me float.

>>12373817
>science is a worldview

>>12370019
>Every probability question is Monty Hall

>>12289281
>NO YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO FACTCHECK ME, EVERYTHING I SAY MUST BE ACCEPTED

>>12280437
I think your stupidity is more basic than I thought. Science doesn't answer "why" question in the way you're using the word. It's a descriptive project.
Also literally any explanation is going to bottom out at some point. If we ever reach a deeper explanation of gravity say the way that we can explain temperature as kinetic energy of small particles, we will still in turn have to explain that explanation or just say "well that's the way it is".
You seriously need to reconsider what you can expect out of a scientific explanation in the first place, because all the issues you're having apply to most things, not just gravity.
Like at base observation what we call gravity is just a grouping of certain movements of objects(and note that those weren't even grouped the way we think of them today until newton).

>watching engineering lecture on zoom
>people asking questions
>"How does the pi*f*T*n become pi*n?"
>"Could you explain why f is 1/T?"
Why are students such brainlets nowadays?

>UHHH, ACKCHUALLY, BRAIN SIZE DOESN'T MATTER!

>>12065894
>We warm like this at the end of every single glacial stage of the Pleistocene
No, this warming is an order of magnitude faster than interglacial warming. It's completely uncorrelated with the precession of Earth, the cause of interglacial warming. And it's occurring at the wrong time. It has absolutely nothing to do with the glacial-interglacial cycle.

>On the flip side, THANK GOD, because this interglacial is colder than like the past 4.
Yes, the last 10,000 years were so horrible for human civilization, thank God we're rapidly leaving it.