/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4618724
Just so I can clarify;

We are not upset because we think you are "wrong".
We are upset because you have completely bastardized the scientific process.

The extent of "evidence" which you've provided us is a video that shows that pink is "not green". Which you then consider a proper justification to say:
>Perhaps this means that these 5-cells appear pink because that is a color native to the spectrum of the 4th dimension.

Also:
>The physics support a physical 4th dimension, why shouldn't there be some way to enter it? Physics supports (at least) 11 dimensions from what I've heard.
You don't even know what a "dimension" is, faggot.

Christ. I haven't been this mad in ages. You are literally too stupid for me to even insult properly.

Call it ESP, call it "psychic", call it telepathy, I don't give a fuck. Just start fucking studying it!

If brains are capable of emitting and receiving electromagnetic frequencies, there is absolutely no reason for us to assume any of these concepts are impossible.

We have the largest brain-to-body ratio in the animal kingdom. I refuse to believe we haven't learned how to interpret these frequencies to at least some degree.

>>4605759
The reason we don't have any similarities to protists is because we deliberately avoid putting anything animal-like in the protist group.

Just fucking include sponges with the protists and call it a day.

>>4582136
Why don't you faggots get it?

Singularity began nearly half a century ago when the internet was created.
>Technilogical boom
>World Unity
>Increasing infiltration of personal life and technology
>Lowering birth rates
>Transition from IRL commodities to virtual ones
>Proliferation of science and technology

C'mon, people. We're living in a glorious age and we're witnessing the future of the world where we all submit to a collective entity comprised entirely of the thoughts and ideas of everyone who knows. Hell, I pressed "submit" just to make this post!

Joking aside;
AI is supposed to be the next step in "intelligence", right? Well, if the braincells combine to make the brain, why is it shocking to think that AI should be powered by human thought in the first place? Humans are only going to build things that help ourselves, so we built computers and the internet to be extensions of our minds, to run thoughts and processes that we didn't have time to deal with.

Just because no one has engineered you a robotic eye, that doesn't mean society has failed. It only means it succeeded in ways you don't understand.

>>4559299
No.

Shut up. You don't know what evolution is. Stop posting.

>>4559303
>so far as i can tell, dumb people have more kids, and being dumb is largely genetic
Hasn't that pretty much been the case all throughout history?

When has there ever been a point in history where stupid people weren't multiplying faster than the smart ones?