/sci/ - Science & Math

>if you had free will, means you could exert it to make random choices. you can will yourself into being random. right?

>Yep the socialization that leads to generations with shared experience which allows us to relate to each other so that we can predict each other's needs and services so that we can start successful businesses that are financially rewarded while providing mutual benefits.
This is how a golem describes being forced to sit in a room for hours while government-appointed authorities brainwash him.

>>15750870
>Qualia as a theory has no predictive power
Maybe that's because qualia are not a theory but a matter of fact.

>Independent non-NPC thinkers recognize that they're just a blob of arranged matter

>>15693400
>These colors we see are an abstraction

>So how do you explain those frozen samples anon?
Remember the days when posts like this could be safely dismissed as trolling? Before the glowniggers on reddit started funnelling the clownworld hordes into 4chan?

>that one cretin obsessing over "radio signals" as if it's in any way relevant

>muh low hanging fruit
The funny thing about these "people" is that they're so incapable of independent thought that they straight up regurgitate their intellectual leaders' opinions word for word, so they can't even try to bluff that they all came to the same braindead conclusion independently.

>>15260801
>all the artwork can be just done procedurally like this and be on par with great artists
Diginal goyslopper.

>>15258794
>t.
Look at this clinical subhuman. It can't stop trying to prove itself to me.

>>15243195
>a security think tank said
Ameritards will apparently never stop falling for this one. Yes, golem, the Soviet Union will reach technological supremacy in two more weeks if you don't feed DARPA more money.

>hint: maybe stop clicking on materialism/idealism threads if you think it's irrelevant. you're not convincing anyone else.

>>15232524
>the conspiracy was that it was a bioweapon from China's bioweapon program. The lab leak is from China's research system. Those are very different situations.
Unbelievable stuff.

>>15227148
>current year's popular abstractions precede the reality they were abstracted from
The unscientific anti-human religion of nonsentients.

>>15222646
>This has infinitely many solutions
Find two.

>Same way you can test it in humans - written exams.
Is this satire? Are state-educated "people" even human?

>>15206525
>Your life will be completely indistinguishable from the lives of 99.9%+ of people with an IQ of 160+. Society at large won't know the difference.

>>15206100
>Vitalism (the idea that there is a soul) was once popular but the advancements in 19th and 20th century science disproved it conclusively
This is what the dronism mental illness looks like.

>>15202693
>Falsifiability itself is already an outdated pre-war cultural standard.
Wrong.

>>15197197
>-1 = i^2 = sqrt(-1)*sqrt(-1) = sqrt(-1*-1) = sqrt(1) = 1
sqrt(x*x) = sqrt(x)*sqrt(x) only for x>= 0.

>>15199602
>"Intelligence" is simply a term to describe "constraining a solution space a lot".
Dumbest take ITT.

>>15196572
>New progress has been made in solving the hard problem.
A year of daily consciousness threads and /sci/ retards still don't understand what the Hard Problem is, and still think it's a literal problem that's supposed to be solved. LOL

>>15189174
>Intelligence is arbitrary.
>Beauty is certainly arbitrary.
I generally oppose eugenics, but reading the sort of shit "people" like you spew makes it very tempting.

>>15184456
>There is nothing, but the physical world.
This is either a vacuous statement (if "physical" is simply a stand-in for the category of everything that exists) or a religious one (if "physical" refers to humanity's current understanding of physics).