/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11315404
Actually it's falsified and tampered with all to fuck and back to the point where it has zero credibility whatsoever, which is actually a real shame because the fundamental science of co2 and the greenhouse effect is sound and the effect of pumping out the levels of co2 we are into the atmosphere is at the very least a potentially dangerous experiment. And yet the argument is so politicized, and the data so undeniably tampered with and munged, and the models so flatly inaccurate, and the presentation methods such complete bullshit, that any actual dangers there are that would show up clearly in the absence of all the above are effectively obfuscated from view and thus become harder to respond to.
Thanks useless liberal fucktards for fucking absolutely everything. What would we do without you?

>>10749389
Why should i trust the data when scientists frequently lie

>>10555029
>Enjoy my ad-hominem fallacy because I don't have a genuine rebuttal against the sourced hard-data you posted.
I agree; you did lose.

>>10499361
What's the matter, bitch? You don't like hard data?

Here's something else you can pretend never happened, climate-screechers.

>>9907579
>Thermometers LIE.
No, global warming "scientists" lie.