/sci/ - Science & Math

science is a word. aspects of science are ideas. words are used to communicate ideas, under the human-derived idea of belief that words must be used to communicate ideas.
so, science is just a subset of human-derived communication.

human communication is not meaningfully accurate, so anything built on top of it wont have the best basis. More than not being inherently accurate, it is also more evidently solely useful for communicating with other humans, so it is not a very encompassing form of communication - almost everything about it is human-centric, and assumptions about measuring the world are then painted or stained with that bias - relative to human.
Humanity expresses a form of shame, which drives a form of inferiority complex, which drives what human's call "innovation". Human "innovation" is not ultimately effective, however.

I want you to take a moment to think about all the efforts which had gone into launching a rocket into space and putting humans on the moon, and compare that against other self evident facts about human measures of the moon prior to those rockets.
You can sit there and claim it must have taken a lot of intelligent people to build such machines with such mathematical precision as to land living human beings on a completely inhospitable planet hundreds of thousands of miles away from Earth wearing atmosphered closed system oxygenated spacesuits.
Then you can think about that they already knew it was an inhospitable planet without oxygen requiring closed system oxygenated spacesuits to be alive there, before they even went there, else they wouldn't have put closed system oxygenated spacesuits on the rocket in the first place.

So, how intelligent was it to waste all those resources to go somewhere that has nothing meaningful in which they found exactly what they knew they were expecting to find?

Also, name one other format of anything humanity has ever done in history in which they found exactly what they were expecting to find.

>>15662839
>there is plenty of evidence that finiteness predates infiniteness.
do you even know what the word "evidence" means

>be chinkanese
>invest all money into bicycle graveyards and ghost cities
>???????????
>claim superconductors are real
好的

>>15581820
>mathematics would no longer be self-consistent
>no longer
it never were, obviously, else this wouldn't be a valid question generating inquisitive response.

are you self aware btw

>>15579530
>is [math] -\frac{1}{6} [/math] larger than [math]-\frac{1}{12}[/math]
?????????????????????

>>15567940
> -1 does not exist on a 2d number line

>>15444643
h'okay.

>legitimately implying humans, the least effective creature in existence, have figured out how to generate and fire a single, controlled electron

need help tying your fucking shoes lmfao kys braindrain pretenders, or start praying to the correct god

>>14962702
>the universe
Yes, the "not nothing"

>>14712001
>That's not what I said.
>I think the only reason I tolerated it at all is because my mother acted the same way, mixing the relevant stuff with a bunch of bullshit, listing endlessly about what she did that day or had to do. So I was conditioned from birth to try to extract signal from all the noise. That's probably what pisses me off the most.

So you don't "hate your mother". You're pissed at ken because he reminds you of your mother. I apologize for the confusion