/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10502374
I'll just give an advice. This world is full of bitter people who do not know integrity nor respect. I've met too many people that talk behind others' back to make themselves feel better.

That's just something I wouldn't do no matter how ridiculous the situation appears. It takes a man to walk away.

And the bitter, little men come in packs because they are nothing alone. They find comfort in making others outcasts. This is the universal trait in the human animal, and education does not teach us human nature.

Don't be that kind of people.

>>10502422
>Their point is not to mimic true neural interactions
I did mention that in my paper, but perhaps you haven't read it yet. I admitted that the brain's detail biology is still unclear and, even if you can tell their differences, you might not be able to name any specific functions regarding the thinking process that they do influence. Many organs are evolved for the sake of optimization, and those can be ignored when we are just talking about the most basic central mechanism of the brain. Last time I checked, neuroscience still haven't figured that out yet, right?

What the article does, it provides a new way of thinking. Studying the composition of nerve cells alone may never give you the answer.