/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15034940
>But when it is not, then you have to accept the consequences of that fact. Namely, partial wavelengths. I told you that there is nothing wrong with that, and this whole diatribe is a giant red herring.
Pssst. Brainlet. You can derive the longitudinal doppler shift with those "partial wavelengths" as you stupidly call them. Meanwhile, your alleged classical derivation of the transverse Doppler shift cannot account for this. Btw I'm not the same anon who just pwned you.