/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15320341
I don't see any reasonable fact of it's benefit, yet there are official governmental and manufacturers concerns which are just accepted based on the premise that:
> covid is really dangerous
> the vaccine protects from it

It appears to me the discussion shifted from:
> take vaccine to protect others
to
> take vaccine to protect yourself
to
> take vaccine to protect yourself from death and severe illness
to
> take vaccine to maybe protects yourself a little from death and severe illness
to
> take vaccine. it doesn't kill or maim you most of the times

the whole foundation of the vaccine discussion just disappeared.
It only about compliance of the consumption of a product.

The entire premise is thrown over the board.
It's all memes, yet pwople still fight over the injection as it is some sort of holy grail.
And the sceptards are retarded yes:
>muh spike protein
Never proven
>muh memeRNA
Never worked
Ignoring all other vaccines which had 0 benefit and increased the morbidity of a good chunk of the population.
>bu but it didn't sterilized the world and killed everyone

>>15166851
>Is free will actually a spectrum?
no.
It is always free.
Free will is only then harmed when you elicit some force which a no cannot stop.
Example: "Eat the bugs"
You can say no or yes.
If I would tie you up, put a device on your mouth, to ensure you don't bite of your own toung, and forcefeed you bugs. You still have have the will to not eat the bugs but I violate your will.

Everything is literally a free will decision.
Everything.
Everything is a decision, even not deciding is a decision.
You decide to not decide.
You decide to obey, weather it is out of fear, or lazyness or any other of the basic sins.
There is no "Determinism" if given unlimited options.

>>14799571