/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10488482
It was only like twice the current budget. We have spent significantly more money on NASA since the end of Apollo than during Apollo itself. Funding is not the main issue, gross inefficiency is.

>>10368434
Source?

>>10319733
Misleading graph. Here is one accounting for inflation. Turns out NASA has lots of funding, it just sucks at using it efficiently.

>>10068922
>US budget for NASA is shrinking since Challenger

Wrong, NASA budget is roughly constant ever since the end of Apollo.

>>9966360

>in these ages of tight budgets

NASA budget is as high as ever, and certainly large enough for a moonbase

they literally do not deserve more money until they learn to use it in an efficient manner

we aint never going to colonize space if a rocket launch costs $ billion

>>9493719
Why do faggots always post that chart and not this one?

What does "% of GDP dedicated to space" have to do with success? If Liberia dedicated 100% of their GDP to space travel tomorrow they wouldn't become the world's space leaders.