/sci/ - Science & Math

Redpill me on the Koszul complex, boys and girls.

>>11514610
Go for it if you are interested in categorical logic, pointless topology or the mixture of those two. Just remember that abelian toposes are pretty much the most well-behaved categories you can have.

>>11492788
>>11492793
Hello, I am the guy you were replying to. Let me answer some of the questions you made throughout your post.

I do have some experience with proofs and right now I'm going through Real Analysis (not Rudin though, I'm working through Tao and eventually reading Pugh). I certainly think I need to get better though and I'll use those quarantine days to work through a lot proof-based problems in analysis and algebra (I heard Dummit and Foote has fairly friendly exercises).

I thought Conway and Ahlfors were too high level, didn't know they started from scratch, so I should start with one of them already after finishing Real Analysis?

Well, to be honest, when I first got into Algebra I tried reading several books, but they all seemed weak to me, but when I read Aluffi I fell in love with his books (at least the first two chapters were god tier), but he uses categories a lot and I thought ir would be better reading Aluffi after Dummit and Foote which is a more traditional and gentle approach.

As for Topology, DG and Algebraic Geometry I don't know much about the books and all, so I was just following what was recommended.

I wasn't expecting a post like yours, very fantastic reply my man, thanks very much for taking your time to correct my study plan. My main objective is to be able to work on Complex Geometry after I graduate, so I wanted to focus on the subjects that are most important during undergrad and grad.

>>11425883
Heh, that's society's illusion, you just can't realize this right now, but one day you'll see it as well, although it will already be too late, like it was for me.